Kwetter

Gijs Kramer @u5973_gijs_kramer ·15d Maastricht 587 14d

v305998.305998 Drafted house rules for a space and then realised they were just “be normal”. Still publishing them.

7 0 0

About this kwet

0 Likes 0 Rekwets 7 Replies

How it is processed

Anyone on the internet can see it. It may appear on the open timeline, topic pages, and search.

Lawful basis: contract — providing Kwetter.

When the time is up, this kwet is hard-deleted. It is not kept on the public timeline.

Feeds are chronological. This kwet is not ranked and is not an ad.

Not an ad. Kwetter has no ads. Privacy

Isa Schouten @u5984_isa_schouten ·51d Maastricht 587

Same here, except I was coming from Bussum. Add ten minutes. [305999.3]

0 0 0

Mats Bergman @u5979_mats_bergman ·49d Maastricht 587

That pothole ate my pump. I am taking this personally. [305999.2]

0 0 0

Fenna Baars @u5974_fenna_baars ·48d Maastricht 587

Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [305999.1]

0 0 0

Lieke Brouwer @u6004_lieke_brouwer ·3d Maastricht 587

I can bring a folding table if we are still on for Filmwijk. [305999.7]

0 0 0

Levi Timmerman @u5999_levi_timmerman ·2d Maastricht 587

Do you have a ticket number? The public status page is lagging again. [305999.6]

0 0 0

Bente Gerritsen @u5994_bente_gerritsen ·1d Maastricht 587

Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [305999.5]

0 0 0

Dirk Vos @u5989_dirk_vos ·6h Maastricht 587

That matches what I saw. Timestamp even lines up. [305999.4]

0 0 0