Replying to @u85547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1985573.2]
LA
LA
Lars Kramer
@u85553_lars_kramer
Joined Jan 2026
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u85547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1585573.2]
LA
Replying to @u85547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1185573.2]
LA
Replying to @u85547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [785573.2]
LA
Replying to @u85547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [385573.2]
LA
Replying to @u85547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [385573.2]
LA
Replying to @u85532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1885558.5]
LA
Replying to @u85532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1485558.5]
LA
Replying to @u85532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1085558.5]
LA
Replying to @u85532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [685558.5]
LA
Replying to @u85532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [285558.5]
LA
Replying to @u85532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [285558.5]
LA
Replying to @u85542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1785568.3]
LA
Replying to @u85542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1385568.3]
LA
Replying to @u85542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [985568.3]
LA
Replying to @u85542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [585568.3]
LA
Replying to @u85542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [585568.3]
LA
Replying to @u85542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [185568.3]
LA
Replying to @u85552_emma_hoekstra
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [2085578.1]
LA
Replying to @u85552_emma_hoekstra
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1685578.1]