Replying to @u77542_yara_veldhuis
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1077568.3]
LA
LA
Lars Janssen
@u77553_lars_janssen
Joined Jan 2026
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u77542_yara_veldhuis
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [677568.3]
LA
Replying to @u77542_yara_veldhuis
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [277568.3]
LA
Replying to @u77542_yara_veldhuis
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [277568.3]
LA
Replying to @u77542_yara_veldhuis
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [277568.3]
LA
Replying to @u77542_yara_veldhuis
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [277568.3]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1777578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1377578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [977578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [577578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [177578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [177578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [177578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [177578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77552_emma_hendriks
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [177578.1]
LA
Replying to @u77547_omar_de_wit
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1977573.2]
LA
Replying to @u77547_omar_de_wit
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1577573.2]
LA
Replying to @u77547_omar_de_wit
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1177573.2]
LA
Replying to @u77547_omar_de_wit
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [777573.2]
LA
Replying to @u77547_omar_de_wit
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [377573.2]