Replying to @u73532_roos_brouwer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1973558.5]
LA
LA
Lars Bergman
@u73553_lars_bergman
Joined Jan 2026
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u73532_roos_brouwer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1573558.5]
LA
Replying to @u73532_roos_brouwer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1173558.5]
LA
Replying to @u73532_roos_brouwer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [773558.5]
LA
Replying to @u73532_roos_brouwer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [373558.5]
LA
Replying to @u73532_roos_brouwer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [373558.5]
LA
Replying to @u73542_yara_jansen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1873568.3]
LA
Replying to @u73542_yara_jansen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1473568.3]
LA
Replying to @u73542_yara_jansen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1073568.3]
LA
Replying to @u73542_yara_jansen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [673568.3]
LA
Replying to @u73542_yara_jansen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [273568.3]
LA
Replying to @u73552_emma_kuiper
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1773578.1]
LA
Replying to @u73552_emma_kuiper
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1373578.1]
LA
Replying to @u73552_emma_kuiper
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [973578.1]
LA
Replying to @u73552_emma_kuiper
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [573578.1]
LA
Replying to @u73552_emma_kuiper
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [573578.1]
LA
Replying to @u73552_emma_kuiper
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [173578.1]
LA
Replying to @u73547_omar_kramer
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1973573.2]
LA
Replying to @u73547_omar_kramer
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1573573.2]
LA
Replying to @u73547_omar_kramer
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1173573.2]