Replying to @u62547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1862573.2]
LA
LA
Lars Kramer
@u62553_lars_kramer
Joined Jul 2025
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u62547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1462573.2]
LA
Replying to @u62547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1062573.2]
LA
Replying to @u62547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [662573.2]
LA
Replying to @u62547_omar_verhoeven
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [262573.2]
LA
Replying to @u62532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1762558.5]
LA
Replying to @u62532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1362558.5]
LA
Replying to @u62532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [962558.5]
LA
Replying to @u62532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [562558.5]
LA
Replying to @u62532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [562558.5]
LA
Replying to @u62532_roos_willems
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [162558.5]
LA
Replying to @u62542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [2062568.3]
LA
Replying to @u62542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1662568.3]
LA
Replying to @u62542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1262568.3]
LA
Replying to @u62542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [862568.3]
LA
Replying to @u62542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [462568.3]
LA
Replying to @u62542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [462568.3]
LA
Replying to @u62542_yara_smit
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [62568.3]
LA
Replying to @u62552_emma_hoekstra
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1962578.1]
LA
Replying to @u62552_emma_hoekstra
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1562578.1]