Replying to @u52332_roos_van_der_meer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [552358.5]
LA
LA
Lars Koster
@u52353_lars_koster
Joined Jan 2026
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u52332_roos_van_der_meer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [552358.5]
LA
Replying to @u52332_roos_van_der_meer
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [152358.5]
LA
Replying to @u52342_yara_baars
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [2052368.3]
LA
Replying to @u52342_yara_baars
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1652368.3]
LA
Replying to @u52342_yara_baars
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1252368.3]
LA
Replying to @u52342_yara_baars
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [852368.3]
LA
Replying to @u52342_yara_baars
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [452368.3]
LA
Replying to @u52342_yara_baars
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [452368.3]
LA
Replying to @u52342_yara_baars
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [52368.3]
LA
Replying to @u52352_emma_schouten
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1952378.1]
LA
Replying to @u52352_emma_schouten
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1552378.1]
LA
Replying to @u52352_emma_schouten
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1152378.1]
LA
Replying to @u52352_emma_schouten
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [752378.1]
LA
Replying to @u52352_emma_schouten
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [352378.1]
LA
Replying to @u52352_emma_schouten
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [352378.1]
LA
Replying to @u52347_omar_bergman
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1752373.2]
LA
Replying to @u52347_omar_bergman
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1352373.2]
LA
Replying to @u52347_omar_bergman
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [952373.2]
LA
Replying to @u52347_omar_bergman
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [552373.2]