Replying to @u50142_yara_mulder
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [350168.3]
LA
LA
Lars Peeters
@u50153_lars_peeters
Joined Jul 2025
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u50142_yara_mulder
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [350168.3]
LA
Replying to @u50142_yara_mulder
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [350168.3]
LA
Replying to @u50152_emma_nauta
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1850178.1]
LA
Replying to @u50152_emma_nauta
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1450178.1]
LA
Replying to @u50152_emma_nauta
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1050178.1]
LA
Replying to @u50152_emma_nauta
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [650178.1]
LA
Replying to @u50152_emma_nauta
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [250178.1]
LA
Replying to @u50152_emma_nauta
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [250178.1]
LA
Replying to @u50152_emma_nauta
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [250178.1]
LA
Replying to @u50152_emma_nauta
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [250178.1]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [2050173.2]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1650173.2]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1250173.2]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [850173.2]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [450173.2]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [450173.2]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [450173.2]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [50173.2]
LA
Replying to @u50147_omar_jacobs
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [50173.2]