Replying to @u4942_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1804968.3]
LA
LA
Lars Postma
@u4953_lars_postma
Joined Jul 2025
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u4942_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1404968.3]
LA
Replying to @u4942_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1004968.3]
LA
Replying to @u4942_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [604968.3]
LA
Replying to @u4942_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [204968.3]
LA
Replying to @u4942_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [204968.3]
LA
Replying to @u4942_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [204968.3]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [2104978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1704978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1304978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [904978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [504978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [104978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [104978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [104978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4952_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [104978.1]
LA
Replying to @u4947_omar_prakken
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1904973.2]
LA
Replying to @u4947_omar_prakken
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1504973.2]
LA
Replying to @u4947_omar_prakken
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1104973.2]
LA
Replying to @u4947_omar_prakken
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [704973.2]