Replying to @u41932_roos_sanders
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1941958.5]
LA
LA
Lars de Vries
@u41953_lars_de_vries
Joined Jan 2026
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u41932_roos_sanders
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1541958.5]
LA
Replying to @u41932_roos_sanders
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1141958.5]
LA
Replying to @u41932_roos_sanders
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [741958.5]
LA
Replying to @u41932_roos_sanders
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [341958.5]
LA
Replying to @u41932_roos_sanders
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [341958.5]
LA
Replying to @u41942_yara_van_leeuwen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1841968.3]
LA
Replying to @u41942_yara_van_leeuwen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1441968.3]
LA
Replying to @u41942_yara_van_leeuwen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1041968.3]
LA
Replying to @u41942_yara_van_leeuwen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [641968.3]
LA
Replying to @u41942_yara_van_leeuwen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [241968.3]
LA
Replying to @u41952_emma_maas
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1741978.1]
LA
Replying to @u41952_emma_maas
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1341978.1]
LA
Replying to @u41952_emma_maas
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [941978.1]
LA
Replying to @u41952_emma_maas
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [541978.1]
LA
Replying to @u41952_emma_maas
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [541978.1]
LA
Replying to @u41952_emma_maas
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [141978.1]
LA
Replying to @u41947_omar_visser
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1941973.2]
LA
Replying to @u41947_omar_visser
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1541973.2]
LA
Replying to @u41947_omar_visser
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1141973.2]