Replying to @u39932_roos_schouten
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1939958.5]
LA
LA
Lars Prakken
@u39953_lars_prakken
Joined Jan 2026
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u39932_roos_schouten
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1539958.5]
LA
Replying to @u39932_roos_schouten
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1139958.5]
LA
Replying to @u39932_roos_schouten
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [739958.5]
LA
Replying to @u39932_roos_schouten
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [339958.5]
LA
Replying to @u39932_roos_schouten
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [339958.5]
LA
Replying to @u39942_yara_gerritsen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1839968.3]
LA
Replying to @u39942_yara_gerritsen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1439968.3]
LA
Replying to @u39942_yara_gerritsen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1039968.3]
LA
Replying to @u39942_yara_gerritsen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [639968.3]
LA
Replying to @u39942_yara_gerritsen
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [239968.3]
LA
Replying to @u39952_emma_brouwer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1739978.1]
LA
Replying to @u39952_emma_brouwer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1339978.1]
LA
Replying to @u39952_emma_brouwer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [939978.1]
LA
Replying to @u39952_emma_brouwer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [539978.1]
LA
Replying to @u39952_emma_brouwer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [539978.1]
LA
Replying to @u39952_emma_brouwer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [139978.1]
LA
Replying to @u39947_omar_timmerman
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1939973.2]
LA
Replying to @u39947_omar_timmerman
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1539973.2]
LA
Replying to @u39947_omar_timmerman
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1139973.2]