Replying to @u34532_roos_veldhuis
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1934558.5]
LA
LA
Lars Jacobs
@u34553_lars_jacobs
Joined Jul 2025
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u34532_roos_veldhuis
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1534558.5]
LA
Replying to @u34532_roos_veldhuis
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1134558.5]
LA
Replying to @u34532_roos_veldhuis
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [734558.5]
LA
Replying to @u34532_roos_veldhuis
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [334558.5]
LA
Replying to @u34532_roos_veldhuis
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [334558.5]
LA
Replying to @u34542_yara_hendriks
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1834568.3]
LA
Replying to @u34542_yara_hendriks
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1434568.3]
LA
Replying to @u34542_yara_hendriks
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1034568.3]
LA
Replying to @u34542_yara_hendriks
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [634568.3]
LA
Replying to @u34542_yara_hendriks
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [234568.3]
LA
Replying to @u34552_emma_wolters
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1734578.1]
LA
Replying to @u34552_emma_wolters
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1334578.1]
LA
Replying to @u34552_emma_wolters
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [934578.1]
LA
Replying to @u34552_emma_wolters
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [534578.1]
LA
Replying to @u34552_emma_wolters
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [534578.1]
LA
Replying to @u34552_emma_wolters
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [134578.1]
LA
Replying to @u34547_omar_de_vries
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1934573.2]
LA
Replying to @u34547_omar_de_vries
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1534573.2]
LA
Replying to @u34547_omar_de_vries
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1134573.2]