Replying to @u32532_roos_peters
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1932558.5]
LA
LA
Lars Postma
@u32553_lars_postma
Joined Jul 2025
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u32532_roos_peters
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1532558.5]
LA
Replying to @u32532_roos_peters
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [1132558.5]
LA
Replying to @u32532_roos_peters
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [732558.5]
LA
Replying to @u32532_roos_peters
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [332558.5]
LA
Replying to @u32532_roos_peters
That bakery closes at four now. Learned this the expensive way. [332558.5]
LA
Replying to @u32542_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1832568.3]
LA
Replying to @u32542_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1432568.3]
LA
Replying to @u32542_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [1032568.3]
LA
Replying to @u32542_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [632568.3]
LA
Replying to @u32542_yara_martens
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [232568.3]
LA
Replying to @u32552_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1732578.1]
LA
Replying to @u32552_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [1332578.1]
LA
Replying to @u32552_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [932578.1]
LA
Replying to @u32552_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [532578.1]
LA
Replying to @u32552_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [532578.1]
LA
Replying to @u32552_emma_van_der_meer
Disagree mildly: the bottleneck is the registry queue, not the registrar UI. [132578.1]
LA
Replying to @u32547_omar_prakken
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1932573.2]
LA
Replying to @u32547_omar_prakken
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1532573.2]
LA
Replying to @u32547_omar_prakken
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [1132573.2]