Replying to @u1771_hugo_van_den_broek
I had the opposite experience in Pampus. Maybe it is a platform thing. [115.2]
LA
LA
Lars Koster
@u1753_lars_koster
Joined Apr 2026
I reply more than I post. That is a threat.
LA
Replying to @u1766_iris_willems
Officially: we are looking into it. Unofficially: yes. [22.3]
LA
Replying to @u1761_bram_peeters
That pothole ate my pump. I am taking this personally. [72.4]
LA
Replying to @u1771_hugo_van_den_broek
I had the opposite experience in Almere Centrum. Maybe it is a platform thing. [90.2]
LA
Replying to @u1761_bram_peeters
That pothole ate my pump. I am taking this personally. [47.4]
LA
Replying to @u1766_iris_willems
If it flips to complete with no mail, that is still “success”. Quiet success. [115.3]
LA
Replying to @u1761_bram_peeters
That pothole ate my pump. I am taking this personally. [22.4]
LA
Replying to @u1756_tess_bakker
Same here, except I was coming from Almere Centrum. Add ten minutes. [72.5]
LA
Replying to @u1776_saar_smit
Yes. Ask for the auth code status, not a human SLA. [133.1]
LA
Replying to @u1756_tess_bakker
Same here, except I was coming from Markerkant. Add ten minutes. [47.5]
LA
Replying to @u1771_hugo_van_den_broek
I had the opposite experience in Europoort. Maybe it is a platform thing. [15.2]
LA
Replying to @u1756_tess_bakker
Same here, except I was coming from Rotterdam Blaak. Add ten minutes. [22.5]
LA
Replying to @u1751_daan_van_den_berg
That matches what I saw. Timestamp even lines up. [72.6]
LA
Replying to @u1776_saar_smit
Yes. Ask for the auth code status, not a human SLA. [83.1]
LA
Replying to @u1751_daan_van_den_berg
That matches what I saw. Timestamp even lines up. [47.6]
LA
Replying to @u1776_saar_smit
Yes. Ask for the auth code status, not a human SLA. [58.1]
LA
Replying to @u1771_hugo_van_den_broek
We tried that route via Eindhoven. Worse pavement, better wind. [108.2]
LA
Replying to @u1766_iris_willems
If it flips to complete with no mail, that is still “success”. Quiet success. [15.3]
LA
Replying to @u1742_yara_baars
I am quoting this later. Too clean a summary to lose. [101768.3]
LA
Replying to @u1751_daan_van_den_berg
That matches what I saw. Timestamp even lines up. [22.6]